« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 2007

October 27, 2007

ENDA--Now the art of the impossible

Politicians as wimps: Where are those stalwarts who actually vote their principles and never stick their fingers in the wind?  With their eyes on the next election, that being their chief concern, only that which enhances victory is worth voting for or against.  When a representative cares more for self-preservation than their constituents, we've lost our representative government, and are being led by the unworthy.   Consider this (and remember it on election day):

Freshman Democrats Kill Transgender Amendment

By Jonathan E. Kaplan,
The Hill


Reps. Tim Walz (Minn.) and Ron Klein (Fla.), leaders of the class of
freshman Democrats, carried a message to Speaker Nancy Pelosi
(D-Calif.) on Tuesday that their fellow first-term lawmakers did not
want to vote on an amendment extending civil rights to transgender
employees.

House Education and Labor panel Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.),
whose committee passed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, said he
told the freshman lawmakers at their Wednesday breakfast with Pelosi
that the amendment did not have the votes to pass and would not be
brought to the House floor.

In addition, Miller told the freshmen he recognized that the
amendment exposed the first-term lawmakers to political attacks from
conservatives and liberals alike, said two sources who attended the
breakfast.

We can only hope that these freshman never become sophomores.

October 20, 2007

ENDA and the Art of the Possible

“Our movement is used to fighting to win our rights incrementally, often one at a time. We are not, however, used to — nor will we allow — having our people protected one at a time. No civil rights movement has ever left a part of its community behind, and we’re not about to be the first.” — Matt Foreman, Executive Director, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Inc.

A version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), without protections for transgender workers will be considered next week, by the full House, after the measure was narrowly approved on Thursday by the House Committee on Education and Labor. The House also will vote on an amendment by out U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., to put transgender protections back in the bill.

What is at stake here is the fate of the protection of the most unprotected people in America: the Ts (transgenders, transsexuals, transvestites, cross-dressers and intersexuals).  As the bill is currently drawn, the Ts have been omitted, but were in the original draft.  When congress members caught up to the full language of the bill, many balked, even those who ordinarily are for gay rights.  Gay congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass) backed a reformulated bill minus the Ts.

This has caused a firestorm of protest from gay activist organizations, finger pointing, and even the questioning of loyalty to the community.  There are two camps, those who are committed to incremental progress who hope eventually to have the Ts included, and those who are not willing to compromise, who are in the majority.  Both have legitimate arguments.  The incrementalists look to the history of the civil rights movement and see slow but steady progress to full inclusion, and take their victories when they can get them.  The uncompromising call upon ethical and justice arguments and see backing down as a moral failure.

Unfortunately for the uncompromising, the Ts fate is bound up in the most compromising of institutions, the U. S. Congress.  There, politics is defined as the art of the possible, and bills are administered with a finger in the wind for the next election.  My heart is with the uncompromisers, but my head is with the incrementalists.  My hope is that the Ts will eventually, and soon, get their just protection.  Fortunately, many in America are being introduced for the first time to that vital and honored part of the glbT community.  We wish them well. But after all is said and done, will either of the versions of the bill survive the president’s veto?  This is just one more reason to deliver the house, senate and executive branch to the Democrats next November.